Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Lead by the "Spirit"
The "one God"
Monday, August 30, 2010
New Blog
Sunday, August 29, 2010
A still relevant and truthful quote from Pastor Russell
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Preview of "Prerequisite Material"- DEATH
Death is Death
For Christians the Bible is the final authority in all theological matters. What is found within its pages should be the basis for the beliefs of Christians, and not the ideas of theologians or philosophers of the world. Given the authority that the Bible itself carries, does it have anything to say about death and the condition of the dead? Surprisingly, one Christian source says, “The Bible offers no formal definition of ‘death’ and no detailed exposition of what happens to people when they die.”[1] While it is true that the Bible does not offer a “formal definition” of death, it is also true that it does not need to give a “formal definition” in order for the Christian to make a conclusion on the matter. To expect the Bible to give a “formal definition” of death would be anachronistic at best. The Scriptures do in fact offer a satisfying definition of death and of what happens to the deceased one at death.
Instead of trying to find evidence for the support of a doctrine or belief by using the Bible, the Christian should allow the Bible to define[2] the doctrine or belief itself. Indeed, the Bible should be allowed to speak for itself instead of having others try to tell it what it means. That is why for the purposes of this study, the Bible itself will be allowed to speak its divine wisdom and sayings on this subject and shape the understanding of death from its perspective, and not man’s wishful thinking. In what follows will be a brief survey of the Hebrew Bible’s uses of and allusions to death, dying, and other related criteria of interest to this study, beginning with the Pentateuch, commonly cited passages for afterlife, and the poetic writings and proverbs. Then, a brief discussion of the soul will follow.
Pentateuch
Genesis. Appropriately, the first mention of death in the Bible is in the book of Genesis. Genesis 2:16-17 states,
And Jehovah Elohim commanded Man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou shalt freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest of it thou shalt certainly die.[3]
This account in Genesis clears up many things worth noting. It reveals that death was not something inherently woven into the nature of man, for man had not yet experienced death at the time of this utterance. Evidently, God had created man to live everlastingly since death would only come as a result of disobedience and negligence of God’s command not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and bad. Unfortunately, Adam and his wife, Eve, fell short of God’s standards as a little further reading into the book of Genesis reveals. This account not only gives us direct insight into why humans die, but it also gives us insight into what God meant when he said Adam would “certainly die” if he proved to be disobedient. From the very book of Genesis itself, the explanation and meaning of death are given from the standpoint of the Creator himself! God has not left humanity wandering in a state of ignorance on this very important matter. No, the Bible, even the Creator himself, disclose what ‘certain death’ meant when those words were uttered to Adam in Genesis 3:19:
By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return[4]
Indisputably, God’s cautious utterance toward Adam about ‘certainly dying’ meant that he would ‘return to dust’ for that was his origin. That is not to say that man is merely dust, for that is not what the Scriptures present within its pages. Genesis 2:7 reveals a marvelous truth:
And Jehovah God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul[5]
The soul, according to Genesis 2:7, is a combination of at least two elements, namely, “dust of the ground” and “the breath of life.” These two elements are what man is (actually, there may be 3 elements, namely, “breath”, “life”, and “dust.” The breath is the element that gives life, but is not life itself). Removing the “breath of life” from the “dust” results in ‘certain death’ leading man to ‘return to the dust’ from which he was taken. This “breath of life” could be taken from humans forcefully, as was the case in the account of Cain and Abel. This account is the first recorded killing in the Bible and sheds some light on the subject of death.
After Cain had killed Abel, Genesis 4:10 records God as saying,
What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to Me from the ground.[6]
Jehovah said that Abel’s “blood” was “crying” out to him, but what was it about blood that caused it to “cry” out to God? The Bible relates that Jehovah is the “source of life” (Ps 36:9). Man cannot give back a life that he takes, for he is not the “source” of the very thing he took. “All the souls—to me they belong,” says Jehovah in Ezekiel 18:4. Therefore, to take life is to take a possession that belongs to God alone. That is why the “blood” in Genesis 4:10 ‘cries out’ to Jehovah, because life (blood) is something that belongs to God. Thus the killing of any one human can be defined as the intentional (though sometimes unintentional, e.g. accidents) deprivation of life. It is of interest to note that Abel’s blood cried out to God “from the ground.” The phrase “from the ground” is crucial. If death results in man returning to the dust of the ground, then it follows that Abel’s “breath” had been taken from him, thus he returned to the ‘ground’, just as God had warned Adam in the Garden. For that reason it is appropriate for Abel’s “blood” to cry out to God “from the ground” because that’s where he had returned. According to the written record, Abel was the first human to ‘return to dust’, and the Bible supports such an idea by stating that his “blood” cried out “from the ground.”
Elsewhere in Genesis we are giving further perspicacity into the meaning of “death.” Genesis 6:17 records,
As for me, here, I am about to bring on the Deluge, water upon the earth, to bring ruin upon all flesh that has rush of life in it, from under the heavens, all that is on earth will perish[7]
By means of the Deluge God was going to cause all that had the “rush [breath, force] of life” to “perish.” The Hebrew word for “perish” is “[a] verb meaning to expire, to die. The word is apparently from a root meaning to breathe out. This word is used to describe the death of humans and animals in the flood (Gen. 6:17; 7:21).”[8] So, the Hebrew word that “is used to describe the death of humans” carries the notion “to expire”, meaning “to breathe out.” This breathing out is directly related to what God had told Adam. The exiting of the “breath of life” results in man returning to dust, thus the breathing out of this “breath” yields death. It is worth noting how the Bible links the death of humans to ‘breathing out.’ For man, the ‘breathing out’ of God’s breath is death.
An interesting text in relation to the present subject is found at Genesis 25:8 where it reads,
Abraham breathed his last and died in a good old age, an old man and full of years, and was gathered to his people.[9]
After Abraham had “breathed his last”, meaning when the breath of life had exited his body, he “was gathered to his people.” Could it be that, for the first time in human history, the exiting of the breath of life from a human’s body resulted in something other than ‘returning to dust’? Concerning the phrase “gathered to his people”, one source relates “And was gathered to his people: in [Genesis] 15.15 the expression is “go to your fathers.” It is generally accepted that the two expressions are equivalent. However, there are different interpretations of the meaning. Note that t[odays] e[nglish] v[ersion] takes this expression to mean the same as “died,” and considers gathered to his people as a repetition of breathed his last and died. Another view is that gathered … people refers to being placed in the burial place with those who have died before. Others take it to refer to being in Sheol, the place of the dead in the deep parts of the earth. Still others understand it to refer to being remembered by the living as one of the honored ancestors.”[10]
Many of the explanations presented above do not suggest anything different from the fate every other man prior to Abraham had been subjected to. For as the handbook explains, the phrase can simply be a repetition of his breathing out or can refer to being burial in a family tomb. Or, this can be a reference to the idea of Sheol (Discussed later), which is synonymous “for… [the] pit, death, and destruction…Here all existence is in suspense, yet it is not a nonplace like utopia, but rather a place where life is no more.[11]
As the Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible points out, Sheol is “a place where life is no more.” If life is no more in Sheol then the obvious implication based on the constant theme of Genesis is that it is a place where humans, whose “breath of life” has exited their bodies, go.
From what has been discussed above, it seems suffice to say that, in Genesis, death is the exiting of the “breath of life” from one’s body. It is a constant theme throughout the book, and more so than any other book, it gives precise details disclosing the ‘mystery’ of death and of other related issues
THEME OF GENESIS:
1. “Dust” + “Breath of Life”= Soul (= living being, whether human or beast)
2. “Dust”- “Breath of Life”= Death
[1] Kenneth D. Boa & Robert M. Bowman Jr., Sense and Nonsense About Heaven & Hell (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007), 37.
[2] By “define” it is not meant a “formal definition”, but a general outline of a concept or idea.
[3] Darby Translation
[4] English Standard Version
[5] American Standard Version
[6] New American Standard Bible
[7] The Five Books of Moses, Everett Fox
[8]Baker, Warren: The Complete Word Study Dictionary: Old Testament. Chattanooga, TN : AMG Publishers, 2003, 194.
[9] The Revised Standard Version
[10] Reyburn, William David ; Fry, Euan McG.: A Handbook on Genesis. New York : United Bible Societies, 1997 (UBS Handbook Series), 568
[11]Elwell, Walter A.; Beitzel, Barry J.: Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible. Grand Rapids, Mich. : Baker Book House, 1988, S. 1948
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Textual Criticism Bibliography
Textual Criticism:
New Testament Textual Criticism: A Concise Guide
Bruce Metzger
A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament
Roger Omanson
A Textual Guide to the Greek New Testament: An Adaptation of Bruce M. Metzger's Textual Commentary for the Needs of Translators
D.C. Parker
An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and their Texts
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Kingdom Interlinear Translation
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Basics of Biblical Greek
A third factor is that learning a new language can be a very difficult task. Although it may at first be relatively easy to learn a few phrases in another language, it may take years of constant effort before you will be able to understand the subtle nuances of that language. In the meantime, the old adage may prove true, A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.- Do You Need to Learn Hebrew and Greek? November 1st, Watchtower (New York, Watchtower, 2009), p. 21
iTunes U
Book Recommendations
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Sense & Nonsense
I recently finished reading Sense & Nonsense About Heaven & Hell by Kenneth D. Boa and Robert Bowman Jr (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007). It’s a brief book surveying various beliefs and misconceptions about heaven, hell, the soul, and other subjects from an Evangelical point of view. To one who doesn’t adhere to the authors’ belief system, it is still beneficial to see how they interact with several different arguments and beliefs of groups such as Jehovah’s Witnesses (a book involving Bowman is surely to include discussions about Jehovah’s Witnesses), Mormons, Universalists, and others. Below I will briefly survey a couple of the more interesting points that I found.
Chapter 2 entitled, The First Person You Meet in Heaven (pgs. 16-26), proposes (and rightfully so) that the only way to truly know about heaven is by seeing what Jesus said about it. The authors supports this idea with the following claims, namely, (1) “Jesus is the only human being who lived in Heaven before becoming human,” (2) “Jesus knew more about Heaven than anyone else who has ever lived,” (3) and that “Heaven is not a state of our minds, but a real spiritual realm populated by personal beings” (p. 17). The latter point was directed to those who suggest heaven is merely a state of mind or an inner feeling (mysticism, in essence).
Some of the more interesting points in this chapter are found on page 23 where the authors say “[o]ur resurrection bodies will be like Christ’s” and “[i]n the resurrection we will be glorified, immortal people.” With regards to the “resurrection bodies” being “like Christ’s,” it is important to remember that the authors view Christ’s body as a heavenly/divine, glorified human body in heaven. So, the authors mean that the believers in Christ will also attain a glorified, divine human body as well (from a Jehovah’s Witnesses perspective, this appears to combine/fuse the earthly and heavenly hope together).
“Heaven,” according to the authors, is “a place where glorified people will live in immortal bodies with both heavenly and earthly aspects” (p. 26). This description only begs one to ask: Can what Evangelicals call “Heaven” be a place, where the angels and God himself reside, since heaven has not always been “a place where glorified people” with “immortal bodies with both heavenly and earthly aspects” have lived? From their statement on page 26, the implied answer is no, and therefore heaven hasn’t always been heaven, which of course is a problem for anyone’s theology.
Chapter 17, which is the last chapter in the book, is also worth discussing (as are many other chapters in the book, but for brevity’s sake, this will be last chapter discussed for this entry’s purposes). On page 159 the authors write:
“When we die- if we are Christians- we go to be with Christ. Since Christ is in Heaven, evidently believers go to Heaven when they die. However, this is not their ‘final destination.’”
From the above quote we see that in the Evangelicals’ theology, “Heaven” is merely an intermediate state where Christians go for a certain amount of time, since it isn’t their “final destination.” The authors further write:
“When believers are in Heaven following their death, they do not have physical bodies but they await their resurrection at the end of history.” (160)
Since heaven is not the Christian’s “final destination,” they are later given “physical bodies” on the New Earth at the resurrection. It appears, then, that in their theology a Christian dies, goes to heaven for a while, then comes back to earth for the resurrection in a glorified, physical heavenly and earthly body.
The question that needs to be asked is very simple, but ultra vital. If Christians die and go to heaven to be in an intermediate state, why would a resurrection be necessary since Christians are already alive in heaven?
Fortunately, the authors give an answer:
“Some people wonder why anyone who is already living with the Lord in Heaven would want or need to be resurrected from the dead. The answer is that we were not meant to live in a disembodied state in a purely spiritual Heaven. God created humans beings to live as embodied being on Earth. Our Spiritual, intermediate state of rest in Heaven will be better than our trouble mortal life now, but it will not be nearly as wonderful as our resurrected, glorified embodied stat on the future New Earth.” (p. 161)
So there we have it. Christians alive in heaven whom are “with the Lord,” need to be resurrected because they weren’t “meant to live in a disembodied state in a purely spiritual Heaven.” Personally, I don’t buy that explanation for several reasons but even if we grant it, I think there’s still another problem. Indeed, if humans were not mean to live in a “purely spiritual Heaven”, then why does God call people, specifically Christians, to live “in a disembodied state” in the “intermediate state”? What is the point or purpose of the “intermediate state” in heaven if that is not the eternal place of Christians and if they weren’t mean to live (or be) there in the first place?
In Protestant/Evangelical/Trinitarian theology, the so called “intermediate state” has taken up the place, role, and expectation of the heavenly hope. That is how Evangelicals account for the heavenly hope in the Bible. To them, this hope is a mere “intermediate state”, which, according to our authors, Christians “were not meant” to live there in the first place!
In conclusion, this book is good to have as a resource for which we can use to interact with their arguments dealing with issues pertaining to heaven, hell, and related subjects. Aside from that, I personally don't see many uses for it.
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Jesus' Preexistence
Concerning these issues, Patrick Navas has written a helpful 49 page paper that may be helpful for some as it pertains to Christ's preexistence. Pre Human Existence